Despite all the phenomena, on the contrary, this is an investment - not baseball. So, for those who enjoy reading investment, but I hate reading basic: do not be discouraged. It's worth the read mode. Return on assets is the height of the tube to invest. Common sense suggests, is not very important. Why everyone should take care of return of return on equity investors, and return on capital invested much to tell you? You do not know a lot of baseball to know that the frequency with which a paste is a step you should not say much about its value to the team. After all, one parking space is a relatively rare phenomenon. Although some players are truly talented when it is plunked it is not always enough to made a big difference, n'est-ce pas? This is true. In itself, the act of a parking is not very productive. But (and this is very interesting), as a rule, a simple picture of the batter to be taken more often provides a list of good "players. Why? The most likely explanation is that the BPH-screen provides a list of players that are similar in other, probably more important. Can discussions have often taken a walk, double, Homer, and to fly more often - on land and in a lower number of double games. A casual baseball fan might think that. Since this blog is to invest, instead of baseball, there is reason to wonder whether such a link exists. Are simply a list of the Top Ten responsibility for HBP: Craig Biggio, Jason Kendall, Fernando Vina, Carlos Delgado, Larry Walker, Jeff Bagwell, Gary Sheffield, Damion Easley, Jason Giambi, and Jeff Kent. After the first ten, the list is no less impressive. # 11-15 are: Derek Jeter, Luis Gonzalez, Alex Rodriguez, Matt Lawton, and Barry Bonds. As this list is the basis for the amounts career actors, who's more about the players who are still in "major" and the plates, a number of phenomena. This fact alone, he said, kids are on this list are players above the average. However, even if one considers the list of BPH every season, the two young players (eg, Jonny Gomes), and in total the boys high BPH always very productive. In other words, more screening for HBP as many "best offers" debate, which is expected. One reason is that the right thing with players from BPH amounts are generally less visible than the good things from other players, instead of doing. There is a parallel in the world to invest? You bet. So, I repeat -- Return on assets is the height of the tube to invest. Return on assets is a good image of high - quality, low - Business Profile. A high level of return on capital not long unnoticed. Sometimes, a high return on assets say. Jakks Pacific (Jakko) is a good example of a high ROA stocks. Yields are, what you expect from a toy. That does not sound like good news for owners of Jakks, but it is. Jakks sold at a price - on - report earnings of about 12 and a price - a - 1st Ratio of sales of the company quickly. Over the past five years, the turnover is at an annual rate of over 25%. Shareholders do not have all the benefits of growth, since the dilution of the share - but something is better than a long discussion of Jakks. The point here is simple. Jakks should not be something special, like a toy, but it is a toy company. Jakks' past profitability shows that only a toy is something very special. Jakks "" normal"ROA of about 5-12% may be nothing extraordinary in the toy store, but it is much more than what most enterprises deserve. If the future growth of Jakks, the current P / E of 12, have been quite ridiculous. If you use the screen for a high return on equity, you may have missed Jakks. But if the screen for a high return on capital, it is clear that such a pact. In any case, I believe Joel Greenblatt magic formula that could also lead to Jakks. Village Supermarket (VLGEA) is another reserve, which are often a good return value, but has never won a Return on Equity enough for a lot of attention. This case is not as convenient as before, but it is expensive in these courses. For at least five years, it is clear Village, as well as an assessment of mediocre businesses. This is something, because the market was measured continuously, as a sub VLGEA - in business, it is not. In 2000 it was purchased VLGEA a discount of 50% in value. In 2001, the average buyer still get a share of over 25% off accounting. Until then, it was the control of the village of return on assets for the last five years have seen, the action was cheap. Over the past ten years, the village Return on Equity is nothing more than the average, but the performance of equity markets has been anything but average. An investor with an eye on the price of the village - a - book report and the other in the eye of the village of performance, the long climb ten years, no sweat. Another of my favorite high ROA stocks CEC Entertainment (CEC) - better known as Chuck E. Cheese. Recently, the action has a good return on capital. However, a simple picture, based on ROE would be much less wonderful businesses, attract your attention with Chuck E. Cheese. Profitability tells a different story. Chuck E. Consistent cheese deserves exceptional performance for the last ten years. Well, it's true that Chuck E. Cheese is a beautiful and Return on Equity. But if you're an investor who knows what is normal, as the number of ROA, a look at CCE ' s return on assets is to surprise you. Debt may be the role of good fairy. Therefore, the investor must be a performance sail. Return on assets can often an overview of what the stroke of midnight, it will be. ROA is only part of the puzzle. But it is an important piece. High performance is no guarantee of quality. But I found that Mr. Market is usually much smaller, growing companies with a turnover of extraordinary wealth, when it was small, growing companies with returns on capital. Only as a general manager can be exported to a rapid screen for many BPH, you may want to quickly screen for many ROA. I know this is not the best indicator of a good deal. But my experience is rather a lot of ideas sympas. Clearly, a Return on Equity is important. I am not saying that it is not. I'm just saying a high yield is more important than you think.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น